[ccp4bb] Phaser TFZ=100.0 ?

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 12 March 2007

Previous message:
Subject: modelling with sad/mad data
From: Peng Zhang pzhang {- at -} SIBS {- dot -} AC {- dot -} CN
Date: 2007-03-11

Next message:
Subject: Re: Phaser TFZ=100.0 ?
From: Andy Purkiss a {- dot -} purkiss {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} CRYST {- dot -} BBK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-03-12

Subject: Phaser TFZ=100.0 ?
From: Andrew Wong 6ahyw {- at -} QLINK {- dot -} QUEENSU {- dot -} CA
Date: 2007-03-12

I was using Phaser for some MR with a data set in P1 (may not actually be
P1, but..), and in every run I always got a list of "solutions" that all
have TFZ=100.0, with a very small LLG (around 0 or even in the negative).
The RFZ is like 4 or less. The solution(s) are definitely wrong, but I'm
just curious why Phaser is doing that? Could the TFZ=100.0 'solutions"
possibly mask out the real solutions?

Andrew

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- March 2007 <-- 12 March 2007

Previous message:
Subject: modelling with sad/mad data
From: Peng Zhang pzhang {- at -} SIBS {- dot -} AC {- dot -} CN
Date: 2007-03-11

Next message:
Subject: Re: Phaser TFZ=100.0 ?
From: Andy Purkiss a {- dot -} purkiss {- at -} MAIL {- dot -} CRYST {- dot -} BBK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-03-12