Re: [ccp4bb] arp/warp in p22121

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- September 2007 <-- 19 September 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen such density?
From: artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG
Date: 2007-09-19

Next message:
Subject: Re: Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.
From: "Paul D {- dot -} Adams" PDAdams {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2007-09-19

Subject: Re: arp/warp in p22121
From: Airlie McCoy ajm201 {- at -} CAM {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK
Date: 2007-09-19

>So I vote for a default of preserving the input convention whatever it
>is, and I definitely vote against all axis permutations unless a) it's
>absolutely necessary (e.g. for consistency with other datasets), and b)
>the user specifically requests it (and really really means it!).
>
>

Phew! It makes a change for someone NOT to want a new option in Phaser!

Airlie

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- September 2007 <-- 19 September 2007

Previous message:
Subject: Re: Has anyone seen such density?
From: artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG artem {- at -} XTALS {- dot -} ORG
Date: 2007-09-19

Next message:
Subject: Re: Why wwPDB and members are doing a poor job.
From: "Paul D {- dot -} Adams" PDAdams {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2007-09-19