| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] Why there are difference density when occupancy is 1.00 |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 23 January 2008Subject: Re: Why there are difference density when occupancy is 1.00 From: Sun Tang suntang2222 {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM Date: 2008-01-23 Thank you for your information. I did do the B factor refinement in CCP4i and at the first several rounds of refinement, there was no such difference map but in the almost final run of refinement (including TLS and restrained), it appeared. The B-factors (about 40) are similar to nearby residues. This confused me. Any ideas? Thank you again for your suggestions. Best, Sun Tang Eleanor Dodson Have you refined the B factors for these residues? Most building software gives some arbitrary b value, which must then be refined. (In fact after any rebuilding activity you need to do a few cycles of refinement before looking at the maps again) Eleanor Sun Tang wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > When I refined a structure, I found strong difference density Fo-Fc at 3 sigma contour for the for five residues which already have occupancy of 1. The density is continuous and so strong as if I did not put the residues there. Why was that? Can I put greater than 1 occupancy for those residues? > > Thank you very much for your opinions and suggestions! > > Best wishes, > > Sun Tang > > > --------------------------------- > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 23 January 2008 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2007 by Quid United Ltd |