| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
|
Re: [ccp4bb] Why there are difference density when occupancy is 1.00 |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 23 January 2008Subject: Re: Why there are difference density when occupancy is 1.00 From: Sun Tang suntang2222 {- at -} YAHOO {- dot -} COM Date: 2008-01-23 I did check teh B-factors and they are similar to the flanking regions (about 40). The difference density appeared at the later stage of refinement (TLS and restrained in CCP4i). What do you think and how to do it? Best, Sun Tang James Irving I suggest checking that the b-factors for those residues aren't unexpectedly high compared to those in the flankinh regions. Cheers, James On 1/23/08, Sun Tang wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > When I refined a structure, I found strong difference density Fo-Fc at 3 > sigma contour for the for five residues which already have occupancy of 1. > The density is continuous and so strong as if I did not put the residues > there. Why was that? Can I put greater than 1 occupancy for those residues? > > Thank you very much for your opinions and suggestions! > > Best wishes, > > Sun Tang > > > --------------------------------- > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. -- Sent from Gmail for mobile mobile.google.com Dr. James Irving NH&MRC C.J. Martin Fellow School of Biomedical Sciences Building 13D Monash University Wellington Road Melbourne 3800 Australia --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- January 2008 <-- 23 January 2008 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2007 by Quid United Ltd |