Re: [ccp4bb] question about processing data

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- March 2008 <-- 17 March 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Re: question about processing data
From: Bart Hazes bart {- dot -} hazes {- at -} UALBERTA {- dot -} CA
Date: 2008-03-17

Next message:
Subject: Re: question about processing data
From: Ed Pozharski epozh001 {- at -} UMARYLAND {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-03-17

Subject: Re: question about processing data
From: Jim Pflugrath jim {- dot -} pflugrath {- at -} RIGAKU {- dot -} COM
Date: 2008-03-17

I would use all the data myself and report that the model was built from a
a dataset with 74% completeness in the 2.25 to 2.15 Anngstrom shell. I
would not put the number 2.15 A in the manuscript title nor in the poster
title.

For me the acceptable completeness is 90% in the highest resolution shell
for the number to get in the title. You will know I reviewed your
paper if you see my telltale reviewer comment. You can put whatever you
want in the PDB deposition field.

Jim

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Melody Lin wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have always been wondering... for a data set diffracting to say
> 2.15Angstrom but in the highest resolution shell (
> 2.25-2.15) the completeness is 74%, should I use merge all the data and call
> it a 2.15 A dataset or I should cut the data set to say 2.25 A where the
> highest resolution shell has better completeness (>85%)? What is an
> acceptable completeness value for the highest resolution shell?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Melody
>

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- March 2008 <-- 17 March 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Re: question about processing data
From: Bart Hazes bart {- dot -} hazes {- at -} UALBERTA {- dot -} CA
Date: 2008-03-17

Next message:
Subject: Re: question about processing data
From: Ed Pozharski epozh001 {- at -} UMARYLAND {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-03-17