[ccp4bb] ITC--favorite instrumentation

Protein crystallography Programs for crystallography X-ray detectors
Basic tutorials:
Protein Peptide

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- March 2008 <-- 26 March 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Coomassie-bound structure?
From: Jacob Keller j-keller2 {- at -} MD {- dot -} NORTHWESTERN {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-03-26

Next message:
Subject: Angle between NCS-axis and Crystallographic axis
From: U Sam us_x {- at -} HOTMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2008-03-26

Subject: ITC--favorite instrumentation
From: "Page, Rebecca" Rebecca_Page {- at -} BROWN {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-03-26

Dear CCP4 community,

We have the possibility of purchasing a new ITC instrument and have been
very interested in the ITC200, which is promoted as an instrument
appropriate for ~10-fold reduction in sample volume. However, I have
also heard that the concentrations required to get good signal are
higher than that of their standard instrument....

1. Has anyone used the ITC200 (microcal)? If so, do you see
improved sensitivity?

2. Has anyone used the TA instrument nano-ITC
(http://www.tainstruments.com/main.aspx?id=263&n=1&siteid=11)

Thanks so much in advance,

Rebecca

Rebecca Page

Brown University

Dept. of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Biochemistry

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- March 2008 <-- 26 March 2008

Previous message:
Subject: Coomassie-bound structure?
From: Jacob Keller j-keller2 {- at -} MD {- dot -} NORTHWESTERN {- dot -} EDU
Date: 2008-03-26

Next message:
Subject: Angle between NCS-axis and Crystallographic axis
From: U Sam us_x {- at -} HOTMAIL {- dot -} COM
Date: 2008-03-26