Quick navigation:        Home   |    Site Map   ||    References   |    Biography   ||    Copyright   |    Other copyright   |    Contact us   |   
Protein structure
 

Re: [ccp4bb] twinned?

 

Basic tutorials:
 
 

CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- April 2008 <-- 03 April 2008
Previous message:
Subject: Re: twinned?
From: Peter Zwart PHZwart {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2008-04-03
Next message:
Subject:
From: "Mueller, Juergen-Joachim" jjm {- at -} MDC-BERLIN {- dot -} DE
Date: 2008-04-03


Subject: Re: twinned?
From: Poul Nissen pn {- at -} MB {- dot -} AU {- dot -} DK
Date: 2008-04-03

Check this paper below - a C222(1) space group (a=212, b= 300, c=575)
frequently appearing as a merohedral twin P2(1) with apparent C222(1)
symmetry was exactly a major problem in the H. marismortui 50S
structure determination.

Poul

Ban N, Nissen P, Hansen J, Capel M, Moore PB, Steitz TA.

Placement of protein and RNA structures into a 5 A-resolution map of
the 50S ribosomal subunit.
Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):841-7.


On 03/04/2008, at 17.48, Bart Hazes wrote:

> I just realized that this is an orthorhombic C222(1) space group. I
> didn't check it up but unless two of the cell-dimensions are nearly
> identical I think merohedral twinning is not possible for this space
> group, because the symmetry of the unit cell shape is not higher
> than the symmetry of the space group.
>
> Bart
>
> Eleanor Dodson wrote:
>> It is not really possible to detect twinning by the simple moment
>> and cumulative distribution tests for data from a crystal with
>> pseudo translation. As Bart says, twinning decreases the value of
>> the moments, whilst pseudo-translation increases them, so the two
>> effects tend to cancel out. There is a reference to the L test: J.
>> Padilla & T. O. Yeates. A statistic for local intensity
>> differences: robustness to anisotropy and pseudo-centering and
>> utility for detecting twinning. /Acta Crystallogr./ *D59*, 1124-30,
>> 2003. S
>> They suggest using neighbouring reflections pairs to test . This
>> can often overcome the problem associated with pseudo-translation.
>> However it is quite sensitive to data quality.
>> See http://nihserver.mbi.ucla.edu/pystats/
>> Eleanor
>> Bart Hazes wrote:
>>> Hi Qiang,
>>>
>>> A normal data set has a unimodal intensity distribution with a
>>> predictable shape. When there is twinning the distribution remains
>>> unimodal but becomes sharper and this is picked up in the twinning
>>> analysis. When there is pseudo-translational symmetry, as you
>>> indicate you have, then the intensity distribution becomes bimodal
>>> with one set of reflections systematically strengthened and
>>> another systematically weakened. This makes the whole distribution
>>> broader, just the opposite of what twinning does, and therefore
>>> shows up as "negative twinning" in the analysis.
>>>
>>> Bart
>>>
>>> Qiang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The data I am working on has a strong translation vector. The
>>>> space group
>>>> is C2221 and resolution is 2.3 angstrom. There are two molecules
>>>> per AU
>>>> with a pseudo-2-fold axis.
>>>> On the cumulative intensity distribution plot, the theor and
>>>> obser curves
>>>> totally do not overlap. I did "detect_twinning" from CNS, and
>>>> there is the
>>>> result:
>>>>
>>>> <
I
^2>/(<
I
>)^2 = 3.2236 (2.0 for untwinned, 1.5 for
>>>> twinned)
>>>> (<
F
>)^2/<
F
^2> = 0.6937 (0.785 for untwinned, 0.865 for
>>>> twinned)
>>>> Does the result mean my data is not twinned?
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
>>>> Thank you!
>>>>
>>>> The information transmitted in this electronic communication is
>>>> intended only
>>>> for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
>>>> confidential
>>>> and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
>>>> dissemination or other
>>>> use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information
>>>> by persons or
>>>> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
>>>> received this
>>>> information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at
>>>> 800-856-1983 and
>>>> properly dispose of this information.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>
> Bart Hazes (Assistant Professor)
> Dept. of Medical Microbiology & Immunology
> University of Alberta
> 1-15 Medical Sciences Building
> Edmonton, Alberta
> Canada, T6G 2H7
> phone: 1-780-492-0042
> fax: 1-780-492-7521
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
>


CCP4bb navigation

CCP4bb <-- 2008 <-- April 2008 <-- 03 April 2008
Previous message:
Subject: Re: twinned?
From: Peter Zwart PHZwart {- at -} LBL {- dot -} GOV
Date: 2008-04-03
Next message:
Subject:
From: "Mueller, Juergen-Joachim" jjm {- at -} MDC-BERLIN {- dot -} DE
Date: 2008-04-03



ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2007 by Quid United Ltd