| Quick navigation: | Home | Site Map || References | Biography || Copyright | Other copyright | Contact us | | |
|
Re: [ccp4bb] Refining alternate ligand/autoinhibition |
|
CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 08 May 2007Subject: Re: Refining alternate ligand/autoinhibition From: Eleanor Dodson ccp4 {- at -} YSBL {- dot -} YORK {- dot -} AC {- dot -} UK Date: 2007-05-08 of a particular unit. sp they arent appropriate here and may be muddling things up. On the other hand you shouldnt get any repulsion between pairs of atoms whose added occupancy is <= to 1.0 Is that always the case for your 2 scenarios? Try removing the A and B flags and see if that is better. Eleanor Stefan Arold wrote: > Dear All, > > I am having trouble refining a difficult case of alternate structures > in REFMAC. In the crystal, two states superimpose: > 1) Apo-protein with its own auto-inhibitory tail fixed into the ligand > binding site > and > 2) Peptide-bound protein, where the peptide has displaced the > auto-inhibitory tail. > this also includes alternate side-chains of the protein ligand binding > site, according to the apo state or peptide-bound state > > I was hoping that assigning 'A' and 'B' alternate states (for 'apo' > and 'peptide-bound') to the protein chain (chain A) > [ex: > ATOM 62 C ATYR A 17 20.856 42.150 21.476 0.60 > 75.23 C] > > and state 'B' to the peptide > [ex: > ATOM 87 N BALA D 513 9.910 69.145 50.780 0.40 > 20.00 N] > > would do the job - but unfortunately, even though refmac refines this > structure, the two states 'sense' each other, and refmac refinement > applies repulsive forces, pulling the apo-auto-inhibitory tail and the > peptide away from each other... > > Neither the refmac manual, nor the ccp4bb archives helped, so I > thought one of you might... > > many thanks > > Stefan > > > CCP4bb navigationCCP4bb <-- 2007 <-- May 2007 <-- 08 May 2007 |
| ProteinCrystallography.org: Copyright 2006-2007 by Quid United Ltd |